![]() ![]() Obviously, these two films have gone on to become classics in their own right. ![]() There remain many films like Aliensand Terminator 2 (both directed by James Cameron) that have managed to rebuff the sophomore curse. Though there are countless examples of this phenomenon throughout cinematic history. ![]() Audiences are quick to deem a sequel unsatisfactory if it doesn’t follow the same formula as its predecessor. This certainly applies to Steven Spielberg’s 1984 release of Indiana Jones and the Temple Of Doom. Sometimes, opinions about sequels are unfairly loaded before the film is even released. Maybe it’s unreasonable expectations established by the success of the original. Perhaps it’s impossible to catch lightning in a bottle twice. Now, we’re all wondering what James Mangold will give us this summer with the fifth Indy movie set to be released.Sequels In many instances, sequels are automatically looked upon with a certain distaste. Finally, "Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" was a mediocre attempt at reinvigorating Indiana Jones for the 21st century, but was basically a rehash of "Raiders." "The Last Crusade" is too lighthearted, almost sitcom-like. "Temple of Doom" is closest to the pulpy style of the serials that inspired Spielberg to make "Raiders of the Lost Ark" in the first place. "Raiders of the Lost Ark" is pretty much perfection, one of the best action films of the 1980s. I always thought the Indy movies lessened in quality after ‘Temple’’. In fact, Temple" is the only one of the three following "Raiders" that feels like its own movie. The 1984 prequel to "Raiders of the Lost Ark" might have pushed its PG-13 rating to the limit back in the day, a heart is literally pulled out of a living human's chest, but I found it to being an outrageously entertaining film filled with these incredibly thrilling sequences. I thought it out-poltered ‘Poltergeist.’ There’s not an ounce of my own personal feeling in ‘Temple of Doom.” It was too dark, too subterranean, and much too horrific. Spielberg hasn't been shy about his discontentment with "Temple of Doom," he told the Sun-Sentinel back in 1989 “I wasn’t happy with the second film at all. ![]() I know I’ll be in the minority with this one, but that third instalment was trying to go back to the safe entertainment of ‘Raiders of the Lost Ark,’ but failed miserably in trying to bring back that magic. Yes, again, Tarantino nails the overrated “The Last Crusade” for what it is: dull. It's boring! And not an interesting character. Tarantino later admitted another tidbit that I again agree with: He far preferred "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" to "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade." "I don't like the Sean Connery one at all," he exclaimed. was full of piss and gauge, alright, on the case of back-to-back 'Jaws' and 'Close Encounters,' now he figures he could do no wrong, pushes the envelope, creates PG-13! The movie is so f****** badass, it created a new level in the MPAA! Something Brian De Palma's never been able to do as much as he's tried!" QT actually said something that I agree with, which is definitely not always the case when it comes to his tastes … he believes the best Indiana Jones movie is “Temple of Doom.” Correct! In fact, he thinks it’s Spielberg’s best movie after “Jaws.” The Indiana Jones quadrology came up as a topic of discussion. Quentin Tarantino visited the Reel Blend podcast at with his Cinema Archives buddy, Roger Avary. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |